This again?
That was the first thought I had when reading that ice cream giant Ben & Jerry’s had decided to “drop” their email marketing program in favor of going nearly 100% social media, aka the media-fueled nemesis of email marketing.
I’m going to preface this post by explaining the following thoughts are completely skewed toward the email marketing side of the discussion. In case you hadn’t noticed, that’s kinda the business I’m in.
But as someone that was in traditional marketing for the better part of seven years before coming over to SendLabs, there are some fundamentals I feel that Ben & Jerry’s are completely ignoring.
Email and Social Media can get along. Believe it.
Note I said ‘media-fueled nemesis’ above. That’s because the mentality that social media is somehow going to end email marketing is fueled by this online faction that is hell-bent on hoping they can say “I told you so” if it was ever to happen.
By the way, this is the same group that is saying B & J is “dropping” their email. They are actually reducing down to a yearly email, not eliminating completely. “Drop” sounds sexier and helps push the agenda more, I guess.
As good SendLabs friend and email marketing vet Luke Newton said to me once on the topic of the death of email, “You can’t sign up for any social media network without having a valid email address.” The inbox and use of email isn’t going away. It’s just not. So if the main mechanism and landing place for this communication medium is going to be around for a while, why would email marketing die?
Having said that (Larry David fans anyone?), the email marketing industry loves social media. LOVES IT! Our company uses Twitter every day and also maintains a Facebook page. Our competitors, comparators, friends, critics, etc. all do the same thing. Why does there need to be one or the other? In an age of the end of traditional media and advertising, it’s about a new marketing mix that includes it all.
Which brings me to why the Ben & Jerry’s approach is lazy.
Not everyone is using social media
Gasp! Eek! Passing Out!
I’ve been blessed with a great group of friends and colleagues that I interact with constantly via phone, text, email and social media. I’m 32 years old, but am friends with those of all ages. What I’ve noticed – shocking to some, I’m sure – is that while Facebook is still hot among my friends, Twitter is still not. I’d say less than 10% of my friends have Twitter accounts and less than that can be considered active.
Are you still with me? Did I pop your social media bubble?
The vast minority of people I know just aren’t engaged with Twitter, nor have any reason they want to be. Even on Facebook, they like connecting with people but are a bit wary of the marketing element. They range from VPs of credit unions to lawyers to IT to everything in between. The two things they all have though?
An email address. An inbox.
The Big Ben & Jerry’s Flavored Blunder
According to the articles I’ve read, B & J’s marketing team surveyed their users and based on those results, it was determined their users would rather engage with social media instead. I’ve never been subscribed to their list(s), but clearly they weren’t using email to effectively communicate or add any value to their recipients.
At last check, I can’t target a specific group of my users on Twitter or Facebook within a zip code and send them a message. I can’t say ‘Send this only to people who say they like X flavor or Y flavor’. Instead as a B & J social user, I’m subjected to all of it. What if there’s a store opening up down the street from me? Am I supposed to know through chance or just hope it remains in my feed until I see it?
But with email marketing, I can send a message to specific opt-in users (provided I have the data) about new stores opening up in their area without bothering everyone else. If users indicated they just want to hear about charitable causes, I can send them just charitable emails. See what I’m getting at? With social, you blast everyone with the same messaging, there’s no filter and you have to hope it stays on their feed for long enough for the user to see it.
At last check, the company had three Twitter feeds. Does a user have to follow all three to be engaged? Isn’t that a bit much?
I can send an email to someone right now and it’s right there in the place they use the most: the inbox. If I’ve done things the right way, the recipient will welcome the email and not view it as an interruption. This leads me to the final takeaway here.
The Lazy Comment
It’s clear that Ben & Jerry’s simply took the easy way out. They didn’t want to invest any effort or time into email marketing to begin with and thus saw it as an expense, rather than an asset. With Facebook or Twitter, they have to simply paste a link or write 140 characters and “interact”.
Meanwhile, they have very light metrics on who is viewing their messaging, when they are viewing it and if their message is moving the meter or not. They have no targeting available to them, but if looking at numbers of followers, fans and likes is all they need to judge how things are going, more power to them.
By abandoning their email marketing program, they’ve said to those people who have just an email address or don’t want to engage via social media that they are not worth their time and effort. That’s a sad statement and one that is very short-sighted in today’s marketing world.
By using email and social media together, marketers have more power than ever before to target, interact and convert users into full-blown customers and loyalists. Abandoning one or the other sure feels like a bowl of ice cream left outside on a hot summer day to me.
But maybe I’m melted in my thinking. What do you think? Comment below and let’s discuss.
Josh Nason is the Inbound Marketing Director for SendLabs, a New England-based email marketing software company with great customers across the street and around the globe. Follow him at @joshnason and @sendlabs.